While an all cash portfolio might feel safe, it may not be the best option for retirement planning. Learn the potential downsides here.
Which portfolio sounds “safer”: 100% cash or 100% stocks? Many investors would likely answer “all cash” for a variety of reasons; its stability, liquidity, and resistance to fluctuations in the stock market. But is that actually the case – is cash really king?
The Stability of Cash for Retirement
The primary appeal of cash—stability—is also related to its biggest downside for investors. Though it doesn’t lose value in the short term, cash offers little possibility of long-term growth. That may seem like a fine tradeoff when you see markets bouncing around on a day-to-day basis, but when you’re investing for a future goal—like retirement—you need your portfolio to grow.
MORE: Interested in retirement advice that you can use right now? If you have a $500,000 portfolio, download our retirement guide called "The 15-Minute Retirement Plan." Even if you have something else in place, this must-read guide includes research and analysis you can use today.
While stocks can be volatile in the short term, their longer-term returns exceed cash by a mile, and stocks’ frequency of positive returns rise dramatically with longer holding periods. Short-term volatility is the price to pay for stocks’ longer-term returns, and remaining in cash robs your portfolio of the opportunity to increase in value.
Cash as a Liquid Asset
Cash is the most liquid asset available. If you have money earmarked for a near-term expense such as a down payment on a house, then cash is probably the right call. However, if you’re a growth-oriented investor whose primary goal is retirement planning; an all cash portfolio is actually the riskier option. An all cash portfolio subjects you to the risks of inflation, jeopardizing your ability to reach your long-term investment goals. What your cash is worth today; won’t be worth near that amount when it’s time to retire.
Retirement Planning & the Stock Market
As mentioned earlier, one of the most attractive benefits that cash offers is that is it not subject to the day-to-day gyrations of the stock market, where a portfolio’s value could fluctuate wildly. Because the value of cash is so stable, your portfolio won’t lose money, right?
Wrong. Over time, cash actually loses value because of the insidious effects of inflation. Historically, inflation has averaged almost 3% a year, eating away at cash’s purchasing power over time. If you are planning to maintain a certain living standard while also accounting for expenses such as health care throughout retirement, cash as a retirement planning investment probably won’t cover your needs.
What Should I Do with My Current Cash Assets?
This article is not meant to completely deter you from keeping your cash assets and investments. In many cases, cash assets are the wiser choice. In our view, the question of whether an investment is “riskier” or “safer” makes sense only in light of your specific needs, goals and time horizon—because the ultimate risk in investing is failing to have enough money to meet your goal.
While everyone’s situation is different, an all cash portfolio only makes sense if your time horizon is very short—not the case for most investors. For more retirement planning tips, consult Fisher Investments.