By James Mackintosh, The Wall Street Journal, 6/22/2026
MarketMinder’s View: We found this piece mixed, and as it mentions several publicly traded companies, please note MarketMinder doesn’t make individual security recommendations. We generally agree sentiment is warming toward Tech stocks. High valuations, burgeoning IPO activity and more stock-based mergers and secondary offerings can signal rising expectations toward a certain sector, region or category of stocks—and some of these measures have been heating up, particularly for Tech. But critically for investors, none of these metrics are effective market timing tools, nor do their upticks necessarily signal euphoria has arrived. History shows bull markets can climb for a while alongside warming and even euphoric sentiment. The dot-com bubble is one example, as the charts herein show—gauges including deal value, stock valuations and stock-based M&A activity all began rising in the mid-1990s, years before the bull market ended in March 2000. Second, today’s stock prices don’t predict tomorrow’s. They can always get “more expensive” or “cheaper,” which even the article cedes. “Worse, the baseline for what counts as expensive can change over time as the structure of companies or accounting standards shift. In the case of book value, it now needs so many adjustments as to be virtually useless. One example: The S&P 500’s ratio of price to forecast earnings currently stands just below 20, well down from the 23 times reached both in 2020 and last year, and the record 24.5 times in the dot-com bubble.” On top of this, most widely watched valuation methods rely on backward-looking data, rendering them useless in predicting markets’ direction. So while we generally agree moods are sunnier toward big Tech and Tech-like companies, that doesn’t mean a downturn is around the corner.
Growing US Inequality Is Worsening Social Securityโs Financial Crunch, Group Says
By Aimee Picchi, CBS MoneyWatch, 6/22/2026
MarketMinder’s View: According to the research outfit cited here, one solution to Social Security’s eroding revenue base is to eliminate the annual earnings payroll tax cap ($184,500), which has supposedly caused the program to lose out on faster income growth among top earners. “The share of total wages subject to Social Security taxes has fallen from almost 87% in 1984 to roughly 83% today, largely because high earners' pay has grown much faster than everyone else's, lifting more of their income above the tax cap, the report found.” Perhaps that doesn’t sound huge, but according to some of the estimates discussed here, “Removing or phasing out the tax cap could close between 22% and 67% of the program's funding gap, according to the Social Security Administration's scoring of these proposals.” Now, we don’t think reality is as smooth as the projections here make it out to be, e.g., top earners can find other ways to mitigate tax hits. But sociological discussion about income inequality aside, this proposal inadvertently highlights a separate truth: There are different ways for Congress to patch together Social Security funding if benefits were in jeopardy. For more, see last week’s commentary, “The Politics and Practicalities of the Social Security Trust Fund.”
While the World Scrambles for Oil, China Sits on Full Tanks
By Keith Bradsher, The New York Times, 6/22/2026
MarketMinder’s View: With questions about global oil supply still rampant, this piece sheds some light on a largely overlooked factor: China’s supply glut. Though the Middle Kingdom cut oil imports by roughly one-third since the war’s start, “the crude stockpiles held by the country’s state-owned energy companies remain nearly full. Beijing appears not to have tapped its vast strategic reserves, and storage tanks at Chinese refineries are brimming with gasoline, diesel and other refined products.” As the article aptly explains, this is likely tied to China’s preemptive filling of its reserves pre-Iran war as part of a broader push for self-reliance amid potential supply disruptions (not to mention its long-term strategy of boosting oil imports when prices were low to build stockpiles and reduce its trade surplus). With these stockpiles available, analysts quoted herein suggest Chinese crude oil imports may not return to prewar levels for a while. Given China’s role as the world’s top oil importer, this likely frees up crude for other importers across Europe and Southeast Asia, helping Asia continue adapting to the drop in Chinese diesel and gasoline exports if shipments of refined products remain restricted. Pair this with expectations for rising oil and gas production globally, and there is plenty of evidence that global oil supply shortage worries are off base.
By Keith Bradsher, The New York Times, 6/22/2026
MarketMinder’s View: With questions about global oil supply still rampant, this piece sheds some light on a largely overlooked factor: China’s supply glut. Though the Middle Kingdom cut oil imports by roughly one-third since the war’s start, “the crude stockpiles held by the country’s state-owned energy companies remain nearly full. Beijing appears not to have tapped its vast strategic reserves, and storage tanks at Chinese refineries are brimming with gasoline, diesel and other refined products.” As the article aptly explains, this is likely tied to China’s preemptive filling of its reserves pre-Iran war as part of a broader push for self-reliance amid potential supply disruptions (not to mention its long-term strategy of boosting oil imports when prices were low to build stockpiles and reduce its trade surplus). With these stockpiles available, analysts quoted herein suggest Chinese crude oil imports may not return to prewar levels for a while. Given China’s role as the world’s top oil importer, this likely frees up crude for other importers across Europe and Southeast Asia, helping Asia continue adapting to the drop in Chinese diesel and gasoline exports if shipments of refined products remain restricted. Pair this with expectations for rising oil and gas production globally, and there is plenty of evidence that global oil supply shortage worries are off base.
All the Money Flooding Into AI Is a Giant Warning Sign
By James Mackintosh, The Wall Street Journal, 6/22/2026
MarketMinder’s View: We found this piece mixed, and as it mentions several publicly traded companies, please note MarketMinder doesn’t make individual security recommendations. We generally agree sentiment is warming toward Tech stocks. High valuations, burgeoning IPO activity and more stock-based mergers and secondary offerings can signal rising expectations toward a certain sector, region or category of stocks—and some of these measures have been heating up, particularly for Tech. But critically for investors, none of these metrics are effective market timing tools, nor do their upticks necessarily signal euphoria has arrived. History shows bull markets can climb for a while alongside warming and even euphoric sentiment. The dot-com bubble is one example, as the charts herein show—gauges including deal value, stock valuations and stock-based M&A activity all began rising in the mid-1990s, years before the bull market ended in March 2000. Second, today’s stock prices don’t predict tomorrow’s. They can always get “more expensive” or “cheaper,” which even the article cedes. “Worse, the baseline for what counts as expensive can change over time as the structure of companies or accounting standards shift. In the case of book value, it now needs so many adjustments as to be virtually useless. One example: The S&P 500’s ratio of price to forecast earnings currently stands just below 20, well down from the 23 times reached both in 2020 and last year, and the record 24.5 times in the dot-com bubble.” On top of this, most widely watched valuation methods rely on backward-looking data, rendering them useless in predicting markets’ direction. So while we generally agree moods are sunnier toward big Tech and Tech-like companies, that doesn’t mean a downturn is around the corner.
Growing US Inequality Is Worsening Social Securityโs Financial Crunch, Group Says
By Aimee Picchi, CBS MoneyWatch, 6/22/2026
MarketMinder’s View: According to the research outfit cited here, one solution to Social Security’s eroding revenue base is to eliminate the annual earnings payroll tax cap ($184,500), which has supposedly caused the program to lose out on faster income growth among top earners. “The share of total wages subject to Social Security taxes has fallen from almost 87% in 1984 to roughly 83% today, largely because high earners' pay has grown much faster than everyone else's, lifting more of their income above the tax cap, the report found.” Perhaps that doesn’t sound huge, but according to some of the estimates discussed here, “Removing or phasing out the tax cap could close between 22% and 67% of the program's funding gap, according to the Social Security Administration's scoring of these proposals.” Now, we don’t think reality is as smooth as the projections here make it out to be, e.g., top earners can find other ways to mitigate tax hits. But sociological discussion about income inequality aside, this proposal inadvertently highlights a separate truth: There are different ways for Congress to patch together Social Security funding if benefits were in jeopardy. For more, see last week’s commentary, “The Politics and Practicalities of the Social Security Trust Fund.”