With all that is going on in the world this week, it might seem trivial to zero in on one cog in the global economy. Yet even little nuggets of falling uncertainty matter, and there is one that investors shouldn’t overlook: Even as recession chatter mounts, global supply chain pressures are easing. While they aren’t fast inflation’s only cause, they have been a contributing factor, due primarily to dislocations from lockdowns and reopening. But in recent weeks, things have started settling down a bit, albeit to little fanfare, which should help gradually ease one of the fears in this year’s cocktail of scary stories.
Consider Exhibit 1. Since we featured the New York Fed’s Global Supply Chain Pressure Index (GSCPI) last month, it has fallen further. The GSCPI mashes together various global shipping and transportation costs plus other supply chain indicators including delivery times, backlogs and inventory levels. June’s reading was still elevated relative to the index’s history, but it was noticeably down from December’s peak. This doesn’t mean disruptions won’t flare again—see 2021 after 2020’s spike—but absent further severe lockdowns (like China’s) affecting global supply chains, companies appear to be working through bottlenecks.
Exhibit 1: Global Supply Chain Pressures Elevated, but Easing
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York, as of 7/7/2022. Global Supply Chain Pressure Index, January 1998 – June 2022.
That may not be exactly attention grabbing when far more colorful headlines abound, but this is what we find so interesting: When headlines ignore or dismiss good news, it is evidence of pervasive negative sentiment—what we call the “pessimism of disbelief”—which typically surrounds bear market troughs. Not that we are trying to pinpoint the low, as we think doing so is impossible, but we find the sentiment noteworthy all the same. It is what helps lay the groundwork for recovery as it makes positive surprise easier to attain.
Speaking of Chinese lockdowns, which jammed up production globally—depleting inventories, emptying shelves and spiking prices for the available supply left—they are lifting. As broadly expected, China’s reopening enabled more economic activity there, which should ripple globally. (Exhibit 2) The official manufacturing purchasing managers’ index (PMI) from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) climbed above 50—the dividing line between expansion and contraction—in June after being in contraction since March as COVID lockdowns shuttered major manufacturing regions. While the NBS measure covers more large, state-owned enterprises, the Caixin PMI includes smaller, private-sector firms. It jumped higher into expansionary territory.
Exhibit 2: Chinese Manufacturing PMIs Expanding Again
Source: FactSet, as of 7/1/2022. China’s official and Caixin manufacturing PMIs, January 2020 – June 2022.
Many argue the reopening bounce will fade, and perhaps it will—usually after the quick catch-up phase, growth reverts to pre-pandemic trends. But even those conditions augur well for the flow of goods globally: “The return to more normal business conditions also helped to alleviate pressure on supply chains, as highlighted by a broad stabilisation of vendor performance in June. Notably, this ended a 24-month period of lengthening delivery times for inputs. ... Companies were generally upbeat in their forecasts as they anticipated further increases in production as the pandemic recedes and further improvements in client demand.”[i] With ports there also reopening and working through backlogs, this higher output should soon make its way to stores and factories worldwide.
You can also see evidence of supply chain improvement in the US. After hitting multi-decade highs last year, the Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) manufacturing PMI subindex for supplier delivery times is getting back to normal. (Exhibit 3) So are order backlogs after 2021’s record highs.
Exhibit 3: US Supplier Delivery Times and Order Backlogs Falling
Source: FactSet, as of 7/1/2022. ISM manufacturing PMI supplier deliveries and backlog of orders subindexes, January 2020 – June 2022.
Now, these data are open to interpretation. Without context, they could signal weaker demand. So helpfully, ISM asks firms for extra color. As the report notes regarding deliveries: “The index continues to reflect suppliers’ difficulties in meeting demand from panelists’ companies, but there are clear signs of easing. ... Transportation networks reflected improvement compared to May.”[ii] Then on backlogs: “Backlogs expanded in June at a slower rate, as output remains stable at relatively low levels and new orders have slowed due to excessive lead times and historically high prices.”[iii] To us, the responses suggest as bottlenecks clear—and costs come down—new orders are likely to resume. Demand has seemingly paused amid supply constraints. It doesn’t appear to have been destroyed.
To see how transportation networks have improved and how new orders could pick up once costs come down, look at shipping prices. The Baltic Dry Index (BDI)—which to come full circle, Exhibit 1’s GSCPI incorporates—measures transport costs for bulk goods (think coal and steel). The BDI is down -38% from its May 23 year-to-date high and is about a third of its October 2021 peak. (Exhibit 4) Unsnarling ports and booking ships still isn’t easy, but it isn’t prohibitive, either. Costs to ship goods are around where they were after 2007 – 2009’s recession, and they didn’t prevent recovery then.
Exhibit 4: Transport Costs Climb Down
Source: FactSet, as of 7/8/2022. Baltic Dry Index, 1/1/2009 – 7/7/2022.
Despite clear evidence of substantial improvement in global supply chains, headlines don’t seem to recognize it. In our view, this is the pessimism of disbelief at work. But we think it is also when the potential for positive surprise is highest—and stocks generally start to recover, while most least expect it.
If you would like to contact the editors responsible for this article, please click here.
*The content contained in this article represents only the opinions and viewpoints of the Fisher Investments editorial staff.