MarketMinder Daily Commentary

Providing succinct, entertaining and savvy thinking on global capital markets. Our goal is to provide discerning investors the most essential information and commentary to stay in tune with what's happening in the markets, while providing unique perspectives on essential financial issues. And just as important, Fisher Investments MarketMinder aims to help investors discern between useful information and potentially misleading hype.

Get a weekly roundup of our market insights.

Sign up for our weekly email newsletter.




A Small Fortune, 36 Grandkids and an Inheritance Stuck in Limbo

By Ashlea Ebeling, The Wall Street Journal, 5/15/2026

MarketMinder’s View: Beneficiary designation is rarely newsworthy and is, therefore, easy for many investors to overlook. But it is critical, as this frustrating tale of a family struggling to have their deceased relatives’ retirement assets divided according to their wishes illustrates. These people had an estate plan and powers of attorney, but because there appears to have been a simple mishap in beneficiary designation, the assets have sat in limbo for years. Take the lesson here to the bank. If you haven’t reviewed your retirement account beneficiaries, it is a good idea to put it on your “to do” list. That is doubly true if you have had a recent life event like marriage, divorce, death, birth of a child or grandchild. These seemingly minor and simple things can cause major issues if left unattended.


Inflation Rate Projected to Hit 6% in the Second Quarter, Top Economic Forecasters Say

By Jeff Cox, CNBC, 5/15/2026

MarketMinder’s View: So this coverage is a bit jumbled, includes several outright errors (it refers to the first quarter several times in the body, but as the title correctly notes, the forecasts are for the second quarter) and is generally unclear. (Sorry if that seems harsh, but we call a spade a spade ‘round here.) This isn’t a survey of “top forecasters” as ranked by some impartial referee, it is a group of professional forecasters the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia surveys each quarter. Some are anonymous. Some named, including around 50 economists whose outlooks frequently dot headlines. The inflation rate they forecast is the annualized quarterly change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index. So, let us consider the 6% annualized inflation number the headline touts. One, it is headline CPI (the same economists project an average 4.5% annualized PCE price rise in Q2, core CPI and PCE of 3.2% and 3.4%, respectively). The article treats that 6% annualized number as new and earthshattering. But April’s 0.6% m/m CPI annualizes to ~7.4%. So what these economists are forecasting is slower month-over-month CPI in May and June. This is further highlighted by the fact the group’s average inflation rate in Q3 is 3.0% annualized. So it is really just a way of spinning what we already knew (prices were hot in April, largely on oil) in a different manner. Furthermore, we would note: Stocks are well aware of all of this. Again, the economists’ forecasts here are widely covered in headlines. They comprise the consensus stocks pre-price day by day. This really isn’t a shock no matter how you slice and dice it.


Carney, Smith Reach Energy Agreement That Could See Pipeline Construction Start in 2027

By Michael Woods, CBC, 5/15/2026

MarketMinder’s View: This article touches on politics, so please note that MarketMinder favors no politician nor any political party, assessing matters solely for their potential market and/or economic effects. It appears that, after years of talks, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta’s Premier Danielle Smith have struck a deal balancing the federal governments demands for carbon mitigation and Alberta’s large oil industry’s need for ways to transport more oil to the market. In an announcement, Carney has agreed to a lower carbon price for emissions from oil producers and heavy industry in Alberta, as well as agreeing to back a new pipeline project that would connect the province’s oil sands regions to the Pacific via British Columbia. While there are hurdles that still need to be cleared (getting indigenous groups’ approval and the province of British Columbia’s), Carney has said he will seek to declare it a project of national interest, which should streamline permitting and cut some red tape. The aim is to begin building the pipeline by next autumn, which would eventually give Canadian oil exporters easier access to Asian markets like Japan. This also ties into two main stories circulating this year: One, it shows Canada is seeking to diversify its trade relationships, as most of its oil still flows to America. Two, it is a way Asia can further reduce reliance on Persian Gulf oil, limiting its exposure to Hormuz blockages in the future. This is, of course, a long way from completion and is well outside the 3 – 30 month period stocks weigh most. But it is interesting and worth monitoring for the longer-term implications.


A Small Fortune, 36 Grandkids and an Inheritance Stuck in Limbo

By Ashlea Ebeling, The Wall Street Journal, 5/15/2026

MarketMinder’s View: Beneficiary designation is rarely newsworthy and is, therefore, easy for many investors to overlook. But it is critical, as this frustrating tale of a family struggling to have their deceased relatives’ retirement assets divided according to their wishes illustrates. These people had an estate plan and powers of attorney, but because there appears to have been a simple mishap in beneficiary designation, the assets have sat in limbo for years. Take the lesson here to the bank. If you haven’t reviewed your retirement account beneficiaries, it is a good idea to put it on your “to do” list. That is doubly true if you have had a recent life event like marriage, divorce, death, birth of a child or grandchild. These seemingly minor and simple things can cause major issues if left unattended.


Inflation Rate Projected to Hit 6% in the Second Quarter, Top Economic Forecasters Say

By Jeff Cox, CNBC, 5/15/2026

MarketMinder’s View: So this coverage is a bit jumbled, includes several outright errors (it refers to the first quarter several times in the body, but as the title correctly notes, the forecasts are for the second quarter) and is generally unclear. (Sorry if that seems harsh, but we call a spade a spade ‘round here.) This isn’t a survey of “top forecasters” as ranked by some impartial referee, it is a group of professional forecasters the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia surveys each quarter. Some are anonymous. Some named, including around 50 economists whose outlooks frequently dot headlines. The inflation rate they forecast is the annualized quarterly change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index. So, let us consider the 6% annualized inflation number the headline touts. One, it is headline CPI (the same economists project an average 4.5% annualized PCE price rise in Q2, core CPI and PCE of 3.2% and 3.4%, respectively). The article treats that 6% annualized number as new and earthshattering. But April’s 0.6% m/m CPI annualizes to ~7.4%. So what these economists are forecasting is slower month-over-month CPI in May and June. This is further highlighted by the fact the group’s average inflation rate in Q3 is 3.0% annualized. So it is really just a way of spinning what we already knew (prices were hot in April, largely on oil) in a different manner. Furthermore, we would note: Stocks are well aware of all of this. Again, the economists’ forecasts here are widely covered in headlines. They comprise the consensus stocks pre-price day by day. This really isn’t a shock no matter how you slice and dice it.


Carney, Smith Reach Energy Agreement That Could See Pipeline Construction Start in 2027

By Michael Woods, CBC, 5/15/2026

MarketMinder’s View: This article touches on politics, so please note that MarketMinder favors no politician nor any political party, assessing matters solely for their potential market and/or economic effects. It appears that, after years of talks, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta’s Premier Danielle Smith have struck a deal balancing the federal governments demands for carbon mitigation and Alberta’s large oil industry’s need for ways to transport more oil to the market. In an announcement, Carney has agreed to a lower carbon price for emissions from oil producers and heavy industry in Alberta, as well as agreeing to back a new pipeline project that would connect the province’s oil sands regions to the Pacific via British Columbia. While there are hurdles that still need to be cleared (getting indigenous groups’ approval and the province of British Columbia’s), Carney has said he will seek to declare it a project of national interest, which should streamline permitting and cut some red tape. The aim is to begin building the pipeline by next autumn, which would eventually give Canadian oil exporters easier access to Asian markets like Japan. This also ties into two main stories circulating this year: One, it shows Canada is seeking to diversify its trade relationships, as most of its oil still flows to America. Two, it is a way Asia can further reduce reliance on Persian Gulf oil, limiting its exposure to Hormuz blockages in the future. This is, of course, a long way from completion and is well outside the 3 – 30 month period stocks weigh most. But it is interesting and worth monitoring for the longer-term implications.