MarketMinder Daily Commentary

Providing succinct, entertaining and savvy thinking on global capital markets. Our goal is to provide discerning investors the most essential information and commentary to stay in tune with what's happening in the markets, while providing unique perspectives on essential financial issues. And just as important, Fisher Investments MarketMinder aims to help investors discern between useful information and potentially misleading hype.

Get a weekly roundup of our market insights.

Sign up for our weekly email newsletter.




Meloni’s Make-or-Break Year

By Amy Kazmin, Financial Times, 1/8/2026

MarketMinder’s View: Please note MarketMinder is nonpartisan, preferring no politician or political party over another. However, this in-depth review of Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s government, in power since September 2022, raises some key themes that investors benefit from internalizing. One, politicians on the campaign trail and politicians in office are different beasts—the former can be bombastic and radical-sounding when trying to win votes, while the latter frequently moderate once in power. “In office, Meloni and her League finance minister Giancarlo Giorgetti have displayed an unexpectedly zealous commitment to fiscal discipline. They have cut Italy’s budget deficit to the 3 per cent of GDP target set by the EU, from 8 per cent when they took charge. … In opposition, the right-wing parties in Meloni’s coalition said that ‘austerity was the worst thing a government can do’, points out economist Veronica De Romanis, a former treasury official who is now a professor at Rome’s Luiss University. ‘But if you look, the current government has imposed the biggest dose of austerity, raising taxes and cutting expenditure.’” Which brings us to the second theme: Politicians have limited political capital, and when elections loom (Italy’s next general election is scheduled for 2027), they are less likely to push major structural reforms that create winners and losers and instead focus on keeping their constituents on board. “But exercises in cutting wasteful expenditures would inevitably put special interest groups on the defensive. That helps explain why Meloni, despite her coalition’s comfortable parliamentary majority, has mostly opted for straight budget cuts after initially shutting down an unsustainable construction bonus, and suspending a controversial welfare scheme.” These themes aren’t unique to Italy, and investors can apply the lessons here to their political analysis elsewhere as they search for investment opportunities. For more, see our December commentary, “Market Lessons From Europe’s Political Dramas.”


BEA Outlines Plans for More Catch Up on Inflation, GDP Data

By Matt Grossman, The Wall Street Journal, 1/8/2026

MarketMinder’s View: For those of you keeping tabs on major monthly US economic data reports, here is some news you can use: The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) will publish a report covering October and November personal consumption expenditures on January 22, while its initial Q4 GDP estimate and December PCE figures will hit February 20. These delays are a consequence of last year’s government shutdown, and the article shares some of the caveats that will accompany the titular datasets. For instance, the BEA relies on the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS’s) data to put together its PCE inflation measure, but “The BLS wasn’t able to collect most price data in October because of the shutdown, and in December published an inflation report covering October and November that left much of the October data blank. That left a problem for the BEA, depriving it of data it relies on in its own calculations. To get around that issue, the BEA said that it will average September and November numbers to interpolate the October missing data.” Now, Q4 2025 price data aren’t likely to trip up forward-looking markets, which have long since moved on, but this one-off workaround reinforces how economic measures are always imperfect—helpful to remember as things get back to normal. Oh and bear in mind that GDP release date hinges on the government not shutting down again at this month’s end.


Labour to Announce Pub Business Rates U-Turn After Industry Outcry

By Peter Walker, The Guardian, 1/8/2026

MarketMinder’s View: As always, MarketMinder’s discussion of politics is nonpartisan and zeroes in on the economic effects (or lack thereof). The article reports the UK Treasury is preparing to U-turn on planned changes to business rates (basically a commercial property tax) for pubs. For some context, Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s Budget last year initially pledged across-the-board cuts for small business, but details released the next day revealed the expiration of COVID-era relief, alongside a property revaluation, would result in major tax hikes for the hospitality sector even with the headline rate cuts. Regarding the end of COVID policies in particular: “This would exacerbate the impact of a revaluation of property valuations, the basis for business rates, which has caused a rise in the taxable value of pubs and restaurants from their Covid-affected lows. Starting from April, rates will rise by 115% for the average hotel and 76% for a pub, compared with 4% for large supermarkets and 7% for distribution warehouses.” But after a sharp outcry from the hospitality industry, the government reportedly plans to climb down from its original plan. Now, from a macroeconomic perspective, hospitality comprises approximately 3% of total UK output (on a gross value added basis, per the Office for National Statistics), so tax changes here aren’t economic gamechangers. More interesting to us is that, “… it will be another U-turn [from the government], following those on curbs to winter fuel payments for older people, and on changes to inheritance tax for farms, the latter announced two days before Christmas.” Government policy isn’t set in stone, worth keeping in mind for those investors who may act based on prospective (or even announced) changes. And together, these changes may help reduce uncertainty and boost sentiment modestly even though their scope is small. For more, see our November commentary, “Few Surprises: Leaks and Trial Balloons Mute the Market Effects of Britain’s Tax Shifts.”


Labour to Announce Pub Business Rates U-Turn After Industry Outcry

By Peter Walker, The Guardian, 1/8/2026

MarketMinder’s View: As always, MarketMinder’s discussion of politics is nonpartisan and zeroes in on the economic effects (or lack thereof). The article reports the UK Treasury is preparing to U-turn on planned changes to business rates (basically a commercial property tax) for pubs. For some context, Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s Budget last year initially pledged across-the-board cuts for small business, but details released the next day revealed the expiration of COVID-era relief, alongside a property revaluation, would result in major tax hikes for the hospitality sector even with the headline rate cuts. Regarding the end of COVID policies in particular: “This would exacerbate the impact of a revaluation of property valuations, the basis for business rates, which has caused a rise in the taxable value of pubs and restaurants from their Covid-affected lows. Starting from April, rates will rise by 115% for the average hotel and 76% for a pub, compared with 4% for large supermarkets and 7% for distribution warehouses.” But after a sharp outcry from the hospitality industry, the government reportedly plans to climb down from its original plan. Now, from a macroeconomic perspective, hospitality comprises approximately 3% of total UK output (on a gross value added basis, per the Office for National Statistics), so tax changes here aren’t economic gamechangers. More interesting to us is that, “… it will be another U-turn [from the government], following those on curbs to winter fuel payments for older people, and on changes to inheritance tax for farms, the latter announced two days before Christmas.” Government policy isn’t set in stone, worth keeping in mind for those investors who may act based on prospective (or even announced) changes. And together, these changes may help reduce uncertainty and boost sentiment modestly even though their scope is small. For more, see our November commentary, “Few Surprises: Leaks and Trial Balloons Mute the Market Effects of Britain’s Tax Shifts.”


Can Germany Escape its Economic Slump in 2026?

By Arthur Sullivan, Deutsche Welle, 1/8/2026

MarketMinder’s View: Moods in Europe’s largest economy are downbeat in the new year, as many experts have lowered their 2026 growth expectations. Besides headwinds weighing on Germany’s export-driven economic model (e.g., US tariffs and cooler relations with China), the article also points out doubts about the effectiveness of Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s spending and investment program. Some are a little optimistic (e.g., the Bundesbank anticipates growth will pick up later in the year), while others question the speed of implementation and its effect (or lack thereof) on output. Interestingly, “It's not only Germany that is banking on a boost from the planned fiscal expansion. A recent survey of 88 economists by the UK's Financial Times newspaper found that many believe Europe's wider hopes of economic recovery hinge on the German plan.” That seems a tad excessive, considering public investment often takes a few spends to reach those who can deploy the capital most effectively—if it gets there at all. The back half of the article touches on a couple other developments, including fears about rising public debt and the potential growth boost from an increase in working days. Folks, if you need more evidence about the relative pessimism in Europe, read the end of that last sentence again: Some project higher 2026 growth because of more working days, i.e., a function of the calendar. That hope depends on a calculation quirk, not better-than-appreciated economic conditions, tells you expectations are low indeed. Now, we aren’t saying German growth is gangbusters, but against this sentiment backdrop, even tepid expansion can positively surprise. For more, see last week’s commentary, “A 2025 Political Lesson to Take to 2026.”


Where Trump’s $2,000 Tariff Dividend Checks Stand Now

By Jessica Dickler, CNBC, 1/8/2026

MarketMinder’s View: As a reminder, MarketMinder isn’t for or against any specific policy—we focus on the potential economic, market and personal finance implications only. In that spirit, remember President Donald Trump’s pledge last year to send some Americans a “$2,000 dividend check” funded by tariff revenue? Here is an update on both the economic and political feasibility. “A one-time $2,000 per-person tariff rebate for those making less than $100,000 would cost $450 billion, the Yale Budget Lab estimated. That’s about twice as much as the total revenue that will be raised by the administration’s tariff hikes in 2026, according to the Yale findings.” So, economically, tariff revenues aren’t likely to suffice in servicing those checks. On the legislative front, “Last July, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., introduced the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025, which proposed a rebate check funded with tariff revenue. The Senate referred that bill to the Committee on Finance, where it remains. ‘Similar to the stimulus checks issued during and after the Covid pandemic, any broad-based benefit program would require legislation passed by Congress,’ [financial analyst Stephen] Kates also said. ‘No such legislation currently exists.’” Lastly, Trump has also talked of deploying tariff revenue in other policy proposals, like funding increased defense spending. So there is competing talk. Remember, readers, talk isn’t action, regardless of which party is in office. Whether you cheer or fear what politicians propose in press conferences or social media, monitor politicians’ actions and ability to do what they say they will. For more, see our November commentary, “For Investors, Public Political Brainstorming Is Noise, Not News.”